When I tell people that psychos torture for their love of torture and the opportunity to be God, I get this dumb look back. First, the torturer holds the life of their victim in their hands; they decide if the victim lives or dies and how much suffering the victim must endure. What a power rush that must be to play God!
Take the life of Murat Kurnaz. What? You say you never heard of him. He is a German citizen who was kidnapped off the streets of Pakistan and was then tortured for five (5) years by the amerikan torture cabal. And what did Murat Kurnaz do to "deserve" this treatment? Nothing. It seems the amerikan gestapo organizations paid some Pakistani three thousand dollars ($3,000) to give them a victim. As best as I can calculate, that is about a half a years salary for the average Pakistani worker. There are a lot of amerikans who would sell anyone into slavery/torture for a half a years salary! Imagine what people in a poor, corrupt country like Pakistan would do for that kind of money.
After two years of brutal torture, the amerikan torture cabal decided that Murat Kurnaz was not a terrorist and posed no threat to amerikan interests. So did they release him from Guantanamo and fly him back home? Of course not. The chained him in a small, damp, dark cell and continued periodic torture for another 3 years.
Murat Kurnaz was "discovered" in Guantanamo by a lawyer, who was there on another mission. With aid from Amnesty International, a request by the German Chancellor and finally the intervention by the President, Murat Kurnaz was released. When he was finally back in Germany, the story of his years in hell became known. And what did the CIA have to say about this? They said "YOU CAN'T PROVE THE TORTURE EVER HAPPENED!"
If you see the movie "Kill The Messenger" you will see a scene where the victim Gary Webb is told that he "can't prove any of it". When I approached Jack Kopac about the idiotic scheme he was participating in he replied "YOU CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING!". Do you see a pattern here?!
If you're ever in a situation where there is crime and corruption and you are told, "YOU CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING" immediately get out of the country or kill them. Those are your choices, because at that point, you are in a kill or be killed situation. Do not, and I repeat, DO NOT believe in the amerikan system!!! You are dealing with people with absolute power(the fascist system) and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Psalm 35:25 - Let them not say in their hearts, Ah, so would we have it: let them not say, We have swallowed him up.
26 Let them be ashamed and brought to confusion together that rejoice at mine hurt: let them be clothed with shame and dishonour that magnify themselves against me.
27 Let them shout for joy, and be glad, that favour my righteous cause: yea, let them say continually, Let the Lord be magnified.
Monday, December 29, 2014
Sunday, December 14, 2014
VINDICATION OF SORTS
While the senate is releasing a report on amerika's use of torture in the
name of national security, Fox News is busy reporting on hearings about
Universal Health Care. Is there any
doubt were conservative interests lie - no health care for many amerikans, but
yes to torture. A nice try at
distracting and confusing those ignorant masses.
ABSOULTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY! Acts like torture are frequently done in the name
of ''national security". Hitler and
the Nazis tried to exterminate the Jews for "national security" and
the German's protege, amerika uses "national security" to commit all
sorts of heinous acts. And amerikans
blindly follow and support evil as long as it is done in the name of their
religion of worshiping the nation. Groups like the CIA commit autrocities
against defenseless people because they can and they will not be held
responsible (absolute power). Then they claim the "saved lives".
Gary Ridgway, an infamous psychopath and serial killer, when asked why he
had killed at least fifty women responded by saying, "because I could and
I could get away with it." Within
groups like the CIA there are psychopaths and serial killers with psychopathic
personalities that torture and destroy human life "because the can and
they can get away with it". When
at least a bit of the truth is about to be exposed, these agents of evil and
their supporters scream "NATIONAL SECURITY".
There recently released movie titled "Kill The Messenger"
tells the real life story of how the fascist state killed an amerikan
reporter who uncovered and then tried to report
heinous illegal CIA acts. The story goes on to show how the CIA and the
supporting elitist fascist system systematically went about destroying this
man's life. It was very much like what
was done to me.
RECENTLY RELEASED:
“American torture was not confined to a handful of aberrational cases or techniques, nor was it the work of rogue CIA agents. It was an officially sanctioned, worldwide regime of torture that had the acquiescence, if not explicit approval, of the top members of both political parties in Congress. It was motivated by far more than interrogation. The evidence for all of this is conclusive and overwhelming. And the American media bears much of the blame, as they refused for years to even to use the word “torture” to describe any of this (even as they called the same techniques “torture” when used by American adversaries), a shameful and COWARDLY abdication that continues literally to this day in many of the most influential outlets.
The Senate Intelligence Committee will release part of its “torture report.” The report is the by-product of four years of work (2009-2013) and is 6,000 pages long. Only the Executive Summary, roughly 600 pages, will be released today. Even some of that is redacted: the names of CIA agents participating in the torture, countries which agreed to allow CIA black sites, and other details. For months, top Democrats on the Committee warred with the Obama Whitehouse due to the latter’s attempts to redact far more vital information than even stalwart CIA ally Dianne Feinstein thought necessary."
None of this has been in any plausible doubt for years. Recall that Gen. Antonio Taguba, who led an official investigation into prisoner abuse, said in 2008: “There is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account.” Gen. Barry McCaffrey said : “We tortured people unmercifully." AMEN TO THAT!
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
MORE FASCIST STATE PROPAGANDA PUT TO REST!!!
This article doesn't even consider exploitation and destruction of the life of a talented, motivated person from the lower income brackets.
Belief in the American Dream has died, and it’s no surprise why. This patriotic philosophy that anyone who gets an education and works hard can find success needs to actually pan out more often than it does in order to keep hope alive. Instead, the United States has developed an economic system where effort and education are secondary to being born with a silver spoon.
As research continues to confirm that kids born into rich families continue to reap the benefits well into adulthood. Meanwhile, those without affluent parents are far more likely to stay poor throughout their lives, even when they “do everything right” by working hard and getting an education. While it’s not impossible to break out of the cycle of poverty, it’s far more difficult than we’d like to imagine.
Based on research by Isabel Sawhill and Richard Reeves. A poor college graduate is equally as likely to end up as someone in the bottom 20% of income earners at age 40 as a high school dropout from an affluent background. Glancing at the top of the chart(not shown here) is even more unsettling. A high school flunky raised by a rich family is almost as likely to become one of the top country’s highest paid workers as a college graduate raised in a poor family is to stay one of the country’s worst paid workers. Where is the fairness in that?
The main perpetuator of inequality appears to be inheritance – children of richer parents often receive money and property (even before their parents are dead) that set them up for an easier, more secure lifestyle. Other grown children take over the family business or get hired to a hard-to-attain job due to parental connections. These are all traits that bypass the need for education, while simultaneously being out of reach to the kids of poor parents.
It’s also worth noting that rich kids have much easier access to education. Their parents have legacies and colleagues that can help get them into elite colleges, as well as the finances to pay the extreme tuitions. The fact that those who skip out on these obvious advantages can still find better rates of success anyway is what’s troubling.
Actually, the process of young poor people putting themselves through college is another big reason for inequality. In order to attend college without the necessary resources, poor students develop massive debts that last for decades. Staying afloat post-graduation generally means taking any job available and moving back to a poor neighborhood, where jobs with better incomes are few and far between
Belief in the American Dream has died, and it’s no surprise why. This patriotic philosophy that anyone who gets an education and works hard can find success needs to actually pan out more often than it does in order to keep hope alive. Instead, the United States has developed an economic system where effort and education are secondary to being born with a silver spoon.
As research continues to confirm that kids born into rich families continue to reap the benefits well into adulthood. Meanwhile, those without affluent parents are far more likely to stay poor throughout their lives, even when they “do everything right” by working hard and getting an education. While it’s not impossible to break out of the cycle of poverty, it’s far more difficult than we’d like to imagine.
Based on research by Isabel Sawhill and Richard Reeves. A poor college graduate is equally as likely to end up as someone in the bottom 20% of income earners at age 40 as a high school dropout from an affluent background. Glancing at the top of the chart(not shown here) is even more unsettling. A high school flunky raised by a rich family is almost as likely to become one of the top country’s highest paid workers as a college graduate raised in a poor family is to stay one of the country’s worst paid workers. Where is the fairness in that?
The main perpetuator of inequality appears to be inheritance – children of richer parents often receive money and property (even before their parents are dead) that set them up for an easier, more secure lifestyle. Other grown children take over the family business or get hired to a hard-to-attain job due to parental connections. These are all traits that bypass the need for education, while simultaneously being out of reach to the kids of poor parents.
It’s also worth noting that rich kids have much easier access to education. Their parents have legacies and colleagues that can help get them into elite colleges, as well as the finances to pay the extreme tuitions. The fact that those who skip out on these obvious advantages can still find better rates of success anyway is what’s troubling.
Actually, the process of young poor people putting themselves through college is another big reason for inequality. In order to attend college without the necessary resources, poor students develop massive debts that last for decades. Staying afloat post-graduation generally means taking any job available and moving back to a poor neighborhood, where jobs with better incomes are few and far between
Sunday, October 12, 2014
What it is like to be a political prisoner in fascist amerika.
Decades of long research shows that "people with power tend to behave like patients with brain damage to the brain's frontal lobes, a condition that can cause overly impulsive and insensitive behavior" (psychopathic). Really?! I could never have guessed that.
In terms of their victims, "the reigning fear narrows focus onto threats and makes the powerless keen observers of those who have power over them. The victims know the powerful better than the powerful know themselves. It's a natural channel for self-preservation". As I said many times, I know a lot about torture, mental terrorism, psychopathic behavior and behavioral psychology because I had to learn the otherwise useless knowledge in order to survive.
What is like to be a political prisoner(victim) in fascist amerika:
I often heard comments during the really hard times of my ordeal to the effect that people questioned how I was able to survive in such a hostile environment. Of course, the whole purpose of the terror and torture by the crazies was that I would not be able to survive - but I did. So what is it like being a political prisoner in a brutal, barbaric state?
I compare being a political prisoner and/or a victim in a political fight to being a soccer ball in a soccer game. In the game you have two teams, or sides of a political battle whose only concern is winning the game; and that's exactly what it is to the players, a game. These teams KICK the ball up and down the field with little success, but the fun for the players is in kicking the ball. Sometimes one side gets lucky and scores a point and that side of the political battle feels good for a moment and then both sides go back to kicking the ball. Of course, the ball is just the inanimate object which is essential to play the game, but which has no say in the direction or outcome of the game.
After a considerable time of being kicked around, the ball becomes battered, deflated and is no longer any use to the teams playing the game. Often the ball just deflates and falls apart(the victim dies). If the ball does survive, but is in bad condition, the ball is tossed aside on a junk pile with other previously used balls. The teams which have to continue playing their games, find a new gleaming ball to kick around and the game continues. The old ball is ignored and left on the junk pile to quietly expire.
As a result of being the ball, I learned to despise both sides in their game of power, but I hold a special, total and complete contempt for those on the side that worship power and believe and practice the lowest level of moral development of "might is right".
Einstein was caught in the "might is right" dilemma to which he responded, "you may be right, but I wouldn't want to live in such a world". Because of who he was, Einstein escaped. I didn't have a choice.
BULLETIN: Wow, right now on TV, a woman is talking about being caught in the "horrors of Hitler's Hell". Of her ordeal, she states that God didn't do this(her ordeal), PEOPLE DID THIS. AMEN!
In terms of their victims, "the reigning fear narrows focus onto threats and makes the powerless keen observers of those who have power over them. The victims know the powerful better than the powerful know themselves. It's a natural channel for self-preservation". As I said many times, I know a lot about torture, mental terrorism, psychopathic behavior and behavioral psychology because I had to learn the otherwise useless knowledge in order to survive.
What is like to be a political prisoner(victim) in fascist amerika:
I often heard comments during the really hard times of my ordeal to the effect that people questioned how I was able to survive in such a hostile environment. Of course, the whole purpose of the terror and torture by the crazies was that I would not be able to survive - but I did. So what is it like being a political prisoner in a brutal, barbaric state?
I compare being a political prisoner and/or a victim in a political fight to being a soccer ball in a soccer game. In the game you have two teams, or sides of a political battle whose only concern is winning the game; and that's exactly what it is to the players, a game. These teams KICK the ball up and down the field with little success, but the fun for the players is in kicking the ball. Sometimes one side gets lucky and scores a point and that side of the political battle feels good for a moment and then both sides go back to kicking the ball. Of course, the ball is just the inanimate object which is essential to play the game, but which has no say in the direction or outcome of the game.
After a considerable time of being kicked around, the ball becomes battered, deflated and is no longer any use to the teams playing the game. Often the ball just deflates and falls apart(the victim dies). If the ball does survive, but is in bad condition, the ball is tossed aside on a junk pile with other previously used balls. The teams which have to continue playing their games, find a new gleaming ball to kick around and the game continues. The old ball is ignored and left on the junk pile to quietly expire.
As a result of being the ball, I learned to despise both sides in their game of power, but I hold a special, total and complete contempt for those on the side that worship power and believe and practice the lowest level of moral development of "might is right".
Einstein was caught in the "might is right" dilemma to which he responded, "you may be right, but I wouldn't want to live in such a world". Because of who he was, Einstein escaped. I didn't have a choice.
BULLETIN: Wow, right now on TV, a woman is talking about being caught in the "horrors of Hitler's Hell". Of her ordeal, she states that God didn't do this(her ordeal), PEOPLE DID THIS. AMEN!
Sunday, October 5, 2014
SOME RANDOM THOUGHTS ON POWER AND SOCIAL ENGINEERING
America vs the Bible: These are the things you are to do: Speak the TRUTH TO ONE ANOTHER, and render true and sound judgment in your courts; That is the Biblical admonition; now compare that to what is done in amerika.
Gandhi stated that the powerful and the elite are "drunk on the red wine of power". Everyone knows that some people who are drunk on alcohol do stupid things. When they do these stupid things, they usually end up injuring and/or destroying themselves and on occasions they destroy the lives of innocent victims with their stupidity. For example, when a drunk drives on the wrong side of a freeway and crashes, he or she frequently destroy the lives of innocent victims they hit or run off the road.
In contrast, when the powerful and elite do something stupid while drunk on the red wine of power, frequently the lives of thousands even millions of people are destroyed. However, unlike the alcohol drunk(s) that did a stupid action, the power drunks are immune from any consequences of their actions and they go on their merry way to commit more stupid acts. You see this sequence of actions almost every day in the news.
Both alcoholic drunks and power drunks have poor judgment, lack rational thought, believe they are indestructible and do stupid things. The difference is that alcoholic drunks usually pay for their acts while power dunks are immune from the consequences of their stupid acts.
Back to social engineering:
Did you know that with elderly couples, women are the abusers and committers of domestic violence against men. It seems that many men become disabled or incapacitated from years of hard labor or years of working in toxic, poisonous environments. The allows the woman in the relationship to become physically dominant and they use this advantage to commit domestic violence, but it is almost never reported by the media. It is all about power.
So why not start a campaign against all forms of violence and abuse in amerika. There is violence in the workplace, in nursing homes, in marriages, in relationships, and in the streets. Why single out violence just against women?
Of course, there is sexual violence in the military. And everyone wants to protect the countries' fighting women. However, did you know, according to statistics I saw last week, most attacks in the military involve men against men. It is only shocking to you because the media would never report those attacks and any male victim knows that the system would not offer him any support or sympathy. I know it was only a movie, but you know what happened to a soldier in "A Few Good Men" when a "Code Red" was issued.
Of course a male assaulting a male in the military would imply homosexual activity and that definitely is a forbidden subject. And that brings me to the initial topic of this post(stupidity). What brilliant minds decided that they should introduce females into an environment where you have virile, young men about 16-20 years old, who are taught that violence and killing is the way to get what you want? The old adage "to the victors go the spoils" is fundamental to the military. These are young male minds whose brains are still developing. Do you think that shouting "KILL" over three thousand times during marine basic training has an effect on those young men's neural pathways? So who thought throwing a few young attractive women into pot was a great idea and there would be no consequences???
And if you think male on male assault is unexpected, let's look at another situation where you have a large, younger all-male population in close quarters. Prisons! They are notorious for male on male assaults - and the external controls over the male prison population is probably greater than it is in the military. Can you imagine what would happen if you mixed in female prisoners - oops, I better not give those ruling elite any ideas. I'm sure somebody will think that is a good way to save(make) money!
Gandhi stated that the powerful and the elite are "drunk on the red wine of power". Everyone knows that some people who are drunk on alcohol do stupid things. When they do these stupid things, they usually end up injuring and/or destroying themselves and on occasions they destroy the lives of innocent victims with their stupidity. For example, when a drunk drives on the wrong side of a freeway and crashes, he or she frequently destroy the lives of innocent victims they hit or run off the road.
In contrast, when the powerful and elite do something stupid while drunk on the red wine of power, frequently the lives of thousands even millions of people are destroyed. However, unlike the alcohol drunk(s) that did a stupid action, the power drunks are immune from any consequences of their actions and they go on their merry way to commit more stupid acts. You see this sequence of actions almost every day in the news.
Both alcoholic drunks and power drunks have poor judgment, lack rational thought, believe they are indestructible and do stupid things. The difference is that alcoholic drunks usually pay for their acts while power dunks are immune from the consequences of their stupid acts.
Back to social engineering:
Did you know that with elderly couples, women are the abusers and committers of domestic violence against men. It seems that many men become disabled or incapacitated from years of hard labor or years of working in toxic, poisonous environments. The allows the woman in the relationship to become physically dominant and they use this advantage to commit domestic violence, but it is almost never reported by the media. It is all about power.
So why not start a campaign against all forms of violence and abuse in amerika. There is violence in the workplace, in nursing homes, in marriages, in relationships, and in the streets. Why single out violence just against women?
Of course, there is sexual violence in the military. And everyone wants to protect the countries' fighting women. However, did you know, according to statistics I saw last week, most attacks in the military involve men against men. It is only shocking to you because the media would never report those attacks and any male victim knows that the system would not offer him any support or sympathy. I know it was only a movie, but you know what happened to a soldier in "A Few Good Men" when a "Code Red" was issued.
Of course a male assaulting a male in the military would imply homosexual activity and that definitely is a forbidden subject. And that brings me to the initial topic of this post(stupidity). What brilliant minds decided that they should introduce females into an environment where you have virile, young men about 16-20 years old, who are taught that violence and killing is the way to get what you want? The old adage "to the victors go the spoils" is fundamental to the military. These are young male minds whose brains are still developing. Do you think that shouting "KILL" over three thousand times during marine basic training has an effect on those young men's neural pathways? So who thought throwing a few young attractive women into pot was a great idea and there would be no consequences???
And if you think male on male assault is unexpected, let's look at another situation where you have a large, younger all-male population in close quarters. Prisons! They are notorious for male on male assaults - and the external controls over the male prison population is probably greater than it is in the military. Can you imagine what would happen if you mixed in female prisoners - oops, I better not give those ruling elite any ideas. I'm sure somebody will think that is a good way to save(make) money!
Friday, September 26, 2014
SOCIAL ENGINEERING - efforts to influence popular attitudes and social behaviors on a large scale.
Latest News first: Enjoying the lower gas prices? It won't last long. The fascist state is now bombing oil production facilities in IRAQ. I can remember when the fascist state considered that tactic as barbaric and evil(it's all relative). My how baseless beliefs can change. Thank ISIS for the lower gas prices - they introduced the concept of competition in oil prices - WHAT A CONCEPT!
COMPETITION for pricing oil - sounds Communist doesn't it?!
Back to Domestic Violence:
Let me show you how the fascist state uses "Domestic Violence" to destroy working class males. I always remember the day at Gamma Supplies when Jack Kopac walked into the lab where I was working alone. He went out of his way to come over to me and then out of nowhere he starts talking about my marriage and my wife in a sarcastic, negative context. When he was done, he turned and walked off to his office.
I stood there a bit bewilder and wondering why he would bring up the topics of my marriage and my wife. I did know that one of the psychopathic characteristics of Kopac is that he loves to mock and laugh at his victims he wants to destroy. I remembered the attempt by him and his sick partners to set me up with prostitutes which I had viewed as an attempt to put me in a position for psychological blackmail in the manner that was shown in the movie "The Firm". But I did not realize at that time the full extent to which the fascists use domestic violence to destroy their male victims.
As I detailed in a much earlier post, I became aware of the full extent of The Crazies use of my wife to control, manipulate and terrorized me while I was at RAM. At one point I even told her that she was so afraid and terrorized by The Crazies, that if they gave her a gun and told her to shoot me, she would do it. And if she had killed me, The Crazies would have seen to it that she would not be convicted of anything because they would create the popular, politically correct scenario that she was just protecting herself from a crazy, violent man. In fact, since my ex-wife was very attractive and intelligent, they probably would have made her a poster child for "domestic violence" against women.
I can still hear her saying to me, "Look what they made me do to you." It takes really sick people to do what they did and now they want use "domestic violence" against women to create the "perfect fascist state" where working class men have no power. My experiences give a pretty vivid picture of how the ruling fascist state uses women to destroy working class males and now they are using "domestic violence" to empower all women over working class men.
Given that the ruling elite are using Social Engineering to beat down men, the obvious question becomes WHY? If you don't know the answer to that question, then you don't have a clue as to what is going on. Here's a couple of big hints: Quick, can you name one woman that was instrumental and key to the overthrow of Batista in Cuba? Name an instant where a group of armed women declared war on an established government.
Using domestic violence is a classic example of Social Engineering. The fascist state wants to create the belief and attitude that the state through tough laws must change the relationship between men and women. That is what Social Engineering is. It is the attempt, usually by a state, to change basic behavior that is a result of centuries or more of human social evolution. To do that requires a lot of indoctrination and power and are enforced usually through laws and police/military action. Such changes are usually met with some level of violent resistance. That is why in the early 1980s, I told everyone who would listen that there would be a dramatic increase in violence by men against women. You didn't have to be a genius to see that, you only need to know the goal of the fascist social engineering efforts.
Let me give you a very vivid, clear example of a failed social engineering attempt in Amerika that was defeated primarily by violence. Has anyone heard of PROHIBITION? It started with small groups like Carrie Nation and the temperance movement. Then other groups joined in and pretty soon it seemed like everyone was against drinking alcohol. Enter the government and new laws(18th amendment to the constitution).
The result was a period of extreme violence within amerika that followed. The rebellion against the laws resulted in more police and more oppression. Eventually the violence, opposition and cost to prohibition became so great that the state realized that it didn't have enough power to be stupid enough to try to eliminate drinking. Hence the 21st amendment.
The ruling state believed they could change thousands of years of social evolution through Social Engineering. Now the fascist state has a lot more power, so it will continue to do even more stupid things in their attempt to create their version of the perfect fascist state.
Next post I might address violence in, not by, the military.
Friday, September 19, 2014
Manufacturing Consensus - Part II
It is hard to ignore the Janay/Ray Rice drama since it so vividly demonstrates how the fascist state manufactures consensus to serve the power goals of the ruling elite. For the less politically savvy, the use of "weapons of mass destruction" is the most infamous and successful example of a manufactured consensus.
First, when I initially saw the ubiquitous videos, I was surprised to see Janay hit Ray Rice and that no one in the media mentioned it. I was beginning to believe I was hallucinating; after all, I am suppose to be crazy! But then on Thursday night(9/11), the Baltimore Ravens played a game and women showed up wearing Ray Rice's number 27. When interviewed, the women repeated what Janay Rice had said in a public statement. But wait, the "EXPERTS" had declared that what Janay Rice had said was typical of a women who were a victim of domestic violence. Janay Rice didn't know what she was saying. Now how could these other women believe the same thing?
And finally, a women commented that Janay had hit Ray Rice, and that if a women hits a man, she just might expect to be hit back. Whoa! How politically incorrect can a person be?! I wasn't hallucinating, other people saw it too. And then, the media slowly acknowledged that Janay Rice had stated in her initial interview with NFL commissioner Rodger Goodell that she had hit Ray. The media had known all along, but didn't report it.
The interesting thing about the on-the-street interviews of the women going to the football game is a TV women reporter's response to what the women said. Her comment was that she wouldn't comment on the above because "SHE DIDN'T WANT TO DIVIDE WOMEN". In other words to her, this was a woman versus men issue and it should be used to grab power and use the fascist state to give women more power over men's lives. Women are not suppose to think for themselves. They are to parrot the fascist line and gain power. Nothing else matters.
Now I don't know how all of this mess is going to work out, but it does show how events are manipulated and media portrayed to create the "perfect" fascist state. Maybe Ray Rice really does beat his wife - I don't know, but I do know that feminists and the fascist state see this incident as a way to transfer power and consolidate the fascist's state control over peoples lives to benefit of the ruling elite. They manufacture consensus.
It's all about MONEY/POWER. I once saw a video of the late General Norman Schwarzkopf shortly after the first invasion of IRAQ in 1991. Gen. Schwarzkopf also had just received five million dollars for his memoirs about the invasion. Somehow, during the interview, Nazi Germany came up and the interviewer asked how intelligent, educated German Generals could have been so supportive the evil of Hitler. Gen. Schwarzkopf looked at the interviewer as if to say "how can you be so stupid"? He then laughed and said "They did it for the MONEY!" This was a man who had received five million dollars for leading a massacre of Iraq - and we all know how that has turned out.
The truth is there if you know what to look for.
In my next post I will demonstrate how the fascist state uses domestic violence for political ends.
First, when I initially saw the ubiquitous videos, I was surprised to see Janay hit Ray Rice and that no one in the media mentioned it. I was beginning to believe I was hallucinating; after all, I am suppose to be crazy! But then on Thursday night(9/11), the Baltimore Ravens played a game and women showed up wearing Ray Rice's number 27. When interviewed, the women repeated what Janay Rice had said in a public statement. But wait, the "EXPERTS" had declared that what Janay Rice had said was typical of a women who were a victim of domestic violence. Janay Rice didn't know what she was saying. Now how could these other women believe the same thing?
And finally, a women commented that Janay had hit Ray Rice, and that if a women hits a man, she just might expect to be hit back. Whoa! How politically incorrect can a person be?! I wasn't hallucinating, other people saw it too. And then, the media slowly acknowledged that Janay Rice had stated in her initial interview with NFL commissioner Rodger Goodell that she had hit Ray. The media had known all along, but didn't report it.
The interesting thing about the on-the-street interviews of the women going to the football game is a TV women reporter's response to what the women said. Her comment was that she wouldn't comment on the above because "SHE DIDN'T WANT TO DIVIDE WOMEN". In other words to her, this was a woman versus men issue and it should be used to grab power and use the fascist state to give women more power over men's lives. Women are not suppose to think for themselves. They are to parrot the fascist line and gain power. Nothing else matters.
Now I don't know how all of this mess is going to work out, but it does show how events are manipulated and media portrayed to create the "perfect" fascist state. Maybe Ray Rice really does beat his wife - I don't know, but I do know that feminists and the fascist state see this incident as a way to transfer power and consolidate the fascist's state control over peoples lives to benefit of the ruling elite. They manufacture consensus.
It's all about MONEY/POWER. I once saw a video of the late General Norman Schwarzkopf shortly after the first invasion of IRAQ in 1991. Gen. Schwarzkopf also had just received five million dollars for his memoirs about the invasion. Somehow, during the interview, Nazi Germany came up and the interviewer asked how intelligent, educated German Generals could have been so supportive the evil of Hitler. Gen. Schwarzkopf looked at the interviewer as if to say "how can you be so stupid"? He then laughed and said "They did it for the MONEY!" This was a man who had received five million dollars for leading a massacre of Iraq - and we all know how that has turned out.
The truth is there if you know what to look for.
In my next post I will demonstrate how the fascist state uses domestic violence for political ends.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
